<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Latino Internet Justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://latinointernetjustice.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 02:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND NET NEUTRALITY&#8230; by Gil C. Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com/2010/12/on-the-first-amendment-and-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-3689</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil C. Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 02:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinointernetjustice.com/?p=567#comment-3689</guid>
		<description>From tech-loving Lifehacker, a primer on Net Neutrality, with pros and cons: http://lifehacker.com/5720407/an-introduction-to-net-neutrality-what-it-is-what-it-means-for-you-and-what-you-can-do-about-it

Nothing like a balanced perspective...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From tech-loving Lifehacker, a primer on Net Neutrality, with pros and cons: <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5720407/an-introduction-to-net-neutrality-what-it-is-what-it-means-for-you-and-what-you-can-do-about-it" rel="nofollow">http://lifehacker.com/5720407/an-introduction-to-net-neutrality-what-it-is-what-it-means-for-you-and-what-you-can-do-about-it</a></p>
<p>Nothing like a balanced perspective&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Response to Inaccurate Claims About the Wireless Industry and Digital Divide by Gil C. Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/09/response-to-inaccurate-claims-about-the-wireless-industry-and-digital-divide/comment-page-1/#comment-3569</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil C. Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinointernetjustice.com/?p=1055#comment-3569</guid>
		<description>Okay, so LESS competition means MORE broadband? Really? Our system is really the BEST at providing cheaper, faster and more broadband to everybody? Here&#039;s the proof AGAINST it: the U.S. has dropped to 25th in the world in broadband. https://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/09/17-0

Damn we&#039;re good. But 24 others are closer to excellent than we are. Or ever will be, at this &quot;competitive rate&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so LESS competition means MORE broadband? Really? Our system is really the BEST at providing cheaper, faster and more broadband to everybody? Here&#8217;s the proof AGAINST it: the U.S. has dropped to 25th in the world in broadband. <a href="https://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/09/17-0" rel="nofollow">https://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/09/17-0</a></p>
<p>Damn we&#8217;re good. But 24 others are closer to excellent than we are. Or ever will be, at this &#8220;competitive rate&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public Safety Network Legislation Not Likely Met for 9/11 Anniversary by Sean Kirkendall</title>
		<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/08/public-safety-network-legislation-not-likely-met-for-911-anniversary/comment-page-1/#comment-3061</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Kirkendall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinointernetjustice.com/?p=1022#comment-3061</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your coverage. There is an effort by those who oppose public safety to pit public safety against consumers regarding their mutual need for additional spectrum. This is ridiculous and very misleading. Having public safety and first responders be able to accept and respond to emergency communications from citizens, public servants in the field, and other individuals is a &quot;consumer&quot; need and an existing unmet public expectation! Indeed, there is no higher consumer need than effective emergency response that uses technology equivalent to what is available commercially. People already expect public safety to be able to receive and share 9-1-1 text messages, video transmissions and pictures, yet our 9-1-1 and other communications centers do not have access to mission-critical broadband or robust wireless data networks to do so today.Most first responders in the field cannot even receive or send data, pictures or videos back to their headquarters, to their colleagues and/or communications centers. People expect that when they make an emergency call on their cell phone that first responders can locate them accurately, but while technology is available to do so, the Federal Communications Commission does not yet require carriers to implement the more advanced technology, so only 6 out of every 10 cell calls can be accurately located by emergency responders. A nationwide public safety broadband network will provide the baseline infrastructure to allow public safety to begin to be able to meet consumer demand and expectations for efficient, effective emergency response. Nobody benefits more than &quot;consumers&quot; from D block spectrum allocation to public safety with funding for the public safety broadband network. And public safety gets nothing from it other than being able to do their job more effectively -- and meeting public demand and expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your coverage. There is an effort by those who oppose public safety to pit public safety against consumers regarding their mutual need for additional spectrum. This is ridiculous and very misleading. Having public safety and first responders be able to accept and respond to emergency communications from citizens, public servants in the field, and other individuals is a &#8220;consumer&#8221; need and an existing unmet public expectation! Indeed, there is no higher consumer need than effective emergency response that uses technology equivalent to what is available commercially. People already expect public safety to be able to receive and share 9-1-1 text messages, video transmissions and pictures, yet our 9-1-1 and other communications centers do not have access to mission-critical broadband or robust wireless data networks to do so today.Most first responders in the field cannot even receive or send data, pictures or videos back to their headquarters, to their colleagues and/or communications centers. People expect that when they make an emergency call on their cell phone that first responders can locate them accurately, but while technology is available to do so, the Federal Communications Commission does not yet require carriers to implement the more advanced technology, so only 6 out of every 10 cell calls can be accurately located by emergency responders. A nationwide public safety broadband network will provide the baseline infrastructure to allow public safety to begin to be able to meet consumer demand and expectations for efficient, effective emergency response. Nobody benefits more than &#8220;consumers&#8221; from D block spectrum allocation to public safety with funding for the public safety broadband network. And public safety gets nothing from it other than being able to do their job more effectively &#8212; and meeting public demand and expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Isn’t the Internet Already Neutral? by Gil C. Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/01/espanol-isn%e2%80%99t-the-internet-already-neutral/comment-page-1/#comment-2894</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil C. Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinointernetjustice.com/?p=629#comment-2894</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m back, with the proof in the pudding: net neutrality will be secured by technology. Here, from a Reddit forum, is the lengthy peroration: http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/iwi43/net_neutrality_is_an_engineering_problem_that_was/

Net Neutrality is an attempt to solve a problem through government regulation that engineers solved long ago through technology.

What is it that proponents of net neutrality fear? They fear that ISPs will charge different amounts depending on which web site you visit, which streaming video source you use, etc. They want government regulations that make that illegal. This is a legitimate concern. What is it that net neutrality opponents fear? They fear that the government will pass regulations based upon whether you are watching a video from NetFlix and posting a video to YouTube or whether you are downloading a pirated movie you found on The Pirate Bay and uploading a data file to WikiLeaks. This is also a legitimate concern.

Both are legitimate concerns, and both have the same technical solution: make it so neither the ISP or the government can tell what kind of bits you are sending and receiving, or tell what sites you are accessing. If all they can see is an encrypted stream of bits indistinguishable from any other set of encrypted bits, they will have no choice but to treat all the bits equally.

This technology is available right now, but it is still rather clunky, requires special configuration, and is rather slow, but we also don&#039;t have any actual examples of either of the above fears happening in real life - just predictions of future trouble - to drive technological progress. If either the ISPs or the government actually start discriminating based upon content, protocol, website, or anything else, that will simply trigger the widespread roll-out of a system that makes it impossible for them to tell one bit from another.

Technical details: (you can skip this paragraph if you wish) Imagine if every PC and every server on the net were nodes on something like a TOR (The Onion Router). Each would act as a middle relay for other onion traffic, but would also act as a specialized entrance/exit relay that can only access the local network. so your web browsing gets mixed in with a bunch of other traffic that is using the bridge node and nobody monitoring the traffic has the slightest clue as to whether you are sending and receiving bits, where they are going, etc. Now I am not saying that the existing TOR system will be good enough - there would be some major performance issues - but it is certainly possible using current technology to make any violation of net neutrality physically impossible, and it is entirely feasible to develop a better system with less of a performance hit.

The bottom line is that engineers are ready to make the entire Net Neutrality issue moot if there is a need to do so. If either side of the current debate wins and it&#039;s as bad as the the other side says it is, we will simply roll out a new system that makes it so that neither the corporations or the government has the ability to discriminate against different kinds of data. Because we have this capability, it would be a colossal waste of effort for either the corporations or the governments to discriminate against some bits or favor other bits.

EDIT: For those who still insist on making this a political argument (and ignoring the fact that it clearly has a technical solution), I suggest reading the Wikipedia article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality --especially the &quot;Arguments for network neutrality&quot; and &quot;Arguments against network neutrality&quot; sections.

I&#039;m done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m back, with the proof in the pudding: net neutrality will be secured by technology. Here, from a Reddit forum, is the lengthy peroration: <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/iwi43/net_neutrality_is_an_engineering_problem_that_was/" rel="nofollow">http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/iwi43/net_neutrality_is_an_engineering_problem_that_was/</a></p>
<p>Net Neutrality is an attempt to solve a problem through government regulation that engineers solved long ago through technology.</p>
<p>What is it that proponents of net neutrality fear? They fear that ISPs will charge different amounts depending on which web site you visit, which streaming video source you use, etc. They want government regulations that make that illegal. This is a legitimate concern. What is it that net neutrality opponents fear? They fear that the government will pass regulations based upon whether you are watching a video from NetFlix and posting a video to YouTube or whether you are downloading a pirated movie you found on The Pirate Bay and uploading a data file to WikiLeaks. This is also a legitimate concern.</p>
<p>Both are legitimate concerns, and both have the same technical solution: make it so neither the ISP or the government can tell what kind of bits you are sending and receiving, or tell what sites you are accessing. If all they can see is an encrypted stream of bits indistinguishable from any other set of encrypted bits, they will have no choice but to treat all the bits equally.</p>
<p>This technology is available right now, but it is still rather clunky, requires special configuration, and is rather slow, but we also don&#8217;t have any actual examples of either of the above fears happening in real life &#8211; just predictions of future trouble &#8211; to drive technological progress. If either the ISPs or the government actually start discriminating based upon content, protocol, website, or anything else, that will simply trigger the widespread roll-out of a system that makes it impossible for them to tell one bit from another.</p>
<p>Technical details: (you can skip this paragraph if you wish) Imagine if every PC and every server on the net were nodes on something like a TOR (The Onion Router). Each would act as a middle relay for other onion traffic, but would also act as a specialized entrance/exit relay that can only access the local network. so your web browsing gets mixed in with a bunch of other traffic that is using the bridge node and nobody monitoring the traffic has the slightest clue as to whether you are sending and receiving bits, where they are going, etc. Now I am not saying that the existing TOR system will be good enough &#8211; there would be some major performance issues &#8211; but it is certainly possible using current technology to make any violation of net neutrality physically impossible, and it is entirely feasible to develop a better system with less of a performance hit.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that engineers are ready to make the entire Net Neutrality issue moot if there is a need to do so. If either side of the current debate wins and it&#8217;s as bad as the the other side says it is, we will simply roll out a new system that makes it so that neither the corporations or the government has the ability to discriminate against different kinds of data. Because we have this capability, it would be a colossal waste of effort for either the corporations or the governments to discriminate against some bits or favor other bits.</p>
<p>EDIT: For those who still insist on making this a political argument (and ignoring the fact that it clearly has a technical solution), I suggest reading the Wikipedia article at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality</a> &#8211;especially the &#8220;Arguments for network neutrality&#8221; and &#8220;Arguments against network neutrality&#8221; sections.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on House Democrats Introduce New Spectrum Bill by House Democrats Introduce New Spectrum Bill ? Latino Internet Justice &#124; fecamalada</title>
		<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/07/house-democrats-introduce-new-spectrum-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-2893</link>
		<dc:creator>House Democrats Introduce New Spectrum Bill ? Latino Internet Justice &#124; fecamalada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinointernetjustice.com/?p=986#comment-2893</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/07/house-democrats-introduce-new-spectrum-bill/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/07/house-democrats-introduce-new-spectrum-bill/" rel="nofollow">http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/07/house-democrats-introduce-new-spectrum-bill/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Limited Spectrum Has Consequences for Health Care Delivery by Wayne Caswell</title>
		<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/07/limited-spectrum-has-consequences-for-health-care-delivery/comment-page-1/#comment-2723</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinointernetjustice.com/?p=957#comment-2723</guid>
		<description>Thanks for referring to my article on Modern Health Talk. The profound societal benefits from broadband and mobile Internet extend beyond the Healthcare services and also have implications for Education, Innovation and Scientific Discovery, Jobs, Government, Transportation, and even National Security. Distance Learning gives new opportunity to folks unable to attend private schools and universities. TeleWork lets employers hire the best knowledge workers no matter where they are and allows the unemployed to accept jobs anywhere without uprooting their family and selling their homes, many of which are &quot;underwater.&quot; The Internet can even affect the landscape of cities with broadband and wireless access in planned communities away from urban centers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for referring to my article on Modern Health Talk. The profound societal benefits from broadband and mobile Internet extend beyond the Healthcare services and also have implications for Education, Innovation and Scientific Discovery, Jobs, Government, Transportation, and even National Security. Distance Learning gives new opportunity to folks unable to attend private schools and universities. TeleWork lets employers hire the best knowledge workers no matter where they are and allows the unemployed to accept jobs anywhere without uprooting their family and selling their homes, many of which are &#8220;underwater.&#8221; The Internet can even affect the landscape of cities with broadband and wireless access in planned communities away from urban centers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Efforts to Revamp Public Safety Communications Network Underway by Efforts to Revamp Public Safety Communications Network Underway &#8230; &#124; lafirulam</title>
		<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/06/efforts-to-revamp-public-safety-communications-network-underway/comment-page-1/#comment-2652</link>
		<dc:creator>Efforts to Revamp Public Safety Communications Network Underway &#8230; &#124; lafirulam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinointernetjustice.com/?p=940#comment-2652</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/06/efforts-to-revamp-public-safety-communications-network-unde... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/06/efforts-to-revamp-public-safety-communications-network-unde.." rel="nofollow">http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/06/efforts-to-revamp-public-safety-communications-network-unde..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Guest Blog: Should Government Address Consumer Wireless Bill Discontent? : Consumer Privacy Awareness</title>
		<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest Blog: Should Government Address Consumer Wireless Bill Discontent? : Consumer Privacy Awareness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?page_id=2#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>[...] Jorge Bauermeister is a former Commissioner of the Puerto Rico Telecommunications Regulatory Board and a former Member of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. In 2005, he was appointed as Chairman of NARUC&#8217;s Consumer Affairs Committee before opening his private practice in San Juan. His blog, Latino Internet Justice, focuses on telecommunications and Internet law. Read full bio here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jorge Bauermeister is a former Commissioner of the Puerto Rico Telecommunications Regulatory Board and a former Member of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. In 2005, he was appointed as Chairman of NARUC&#8217;s Consumer Affairs Committee before opening his private practice in San Juan. His blog, Latino Internet Justice, focuses on telecommunications and Internet law. Read full bio here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spectrum Debate Should Be of Particular Concern for Minorities by Spectrum Debate Should be of Particular Concern for Minorities &#171; by The National Puerto Rican Chamber of Commerce</title>
		<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com/2011/02/spectrum-debate-should-be-of-particular-concern-for-minorities/comment-page-1/#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>Spectrum Debate Should be of Particular Concern for Minorities &#171; by The National Puerto Rican Chamber of Commerce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 01:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://latinointernetjustice.com/?p=674#comment-1378</guid>
		<description>[...] as posted by LatinoInternetJustice: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as posted by LatinoInternetJustice: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Internet Users’ Receive Early Holiday Gift from FCC? &#124; SOLPERSONA</title>
		<link>http://latinointernetjustice.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Users’ Receive Early Holiday Gift from FCC? &#124; SOLPERSONA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?page_id=2#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>[...] post by Jorge Bauermeister, owner and blogger of Latino Internet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post by Jorge Bauermeister, owner and blogger of Latino Internet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

